![]() |
![]() |
|
Winter - Spring, 2006
The Omaha World-Herald reported that even U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta felt the Wright Amendment might be outdated saying, "In a deregulated industry, you wonder whether the Wright Amendment hasn't passed its time." In an effort to head off Congress and give the two cities more time to come up with a solution themselves, both the Dallas and Fort Worth City Coucils planned to vote on resolutions asking Congress to give them until October 1, 2006 to come up with a compromise which they would then present to Congress for consideration. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, Texas Republican, met with both sides and helped promote the attempt to get the cities to agree on a workable plan. Southwest officials protested the initial October 1 deadline, saying: Congress has a short legislative calendar for the year and will be either in adjournment or otherwise finished with all substantive legislative business by October 1. Asking Congress to defer action until October 1, 2006, is resolving to DO NOTHING for all of 2006. Congress will have to reorganize after the elections. Serious legislative activity will not occur for several months. Hence, the resolution as drafted puts the City of Dallas on record as endorsing the status quo well into 2007. Dallas relented and agreed to a deadline of June 14 to make its recommendations, while Ft. Worth settled on August 1. Both mayors promised to work together "for the good of the entire North Texas region." Local politicians explored options for settling the debate, including allowing through ticketing and drafting legislation that would create a regional airport authority for North Texas and determining how such an authority would be structured and governed, Fort Worth made it clear they expected to have equal representation with Dallas if a regional airport authority was created. Meanwhile, the Associated Press reported that American Airlines would finance a group that opposed loosening or eliminating flight restrictions at Dallas Love Field. American said it had provided $500,000 to launch the group, called Stop and Think, whose goal was to get area residents to think about all the issues in the debate ad not just the opportunity for lower fares. Issues like safety, noise, traffic, congestion, pollution, quality of life, job security, and the economic health of the local economy. (As if folks hadn't already thought about these other issues over and over again for the last 27 years.) The group held a press conference to protest expansion at Love Field, and took out full page newspaper ads which read:
It's time to stop. And think. Stop and think. in cooperation with American Airlines. The Dallas Morning News quoted Southwest's Ed Stewart as saying: "This only makes us stop and think about how desperate American Airlines has become, Or stop and think that we still have airfares as expensive as mortgages because there's no competition." In his blog, Mitchell Schnurman of the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram wrote: Whoa, better get the children in the bomb shelter. All this worryin' could be dangerous. He predicted that American Airlines' new ad campaign would be heavy on scare tactics and light on substance. In a separate opinion piece he noted that American was: bankrolling a fear-mongering ad campaign, calling all moms and dads and "the kids they love," and warning ominously about what's next. The airline has added flights at Dallas Love Field and insists it will bring a lot more if Wright goes away. But now it's encouraging residents to talk publicly about their fears, even unfounded, hysterical fears over airline safety at Love. It's also pushing people to complain about airplane noise around Love, about the way it interferes with barbecues and the pleasure of the Nasher sculpture garden. Yet American is flying some of its loudest jets in and out of Love and justifying that choice as "a commercial" consideration. I guess noise is just noise, while money talks. Mike Boyd of the Boyd Group was even more blunt in his piece with the headline
Hide The Children! Comparing it to a bad daytime soap opera, he noted: Here's the sub-message created unknowingly by American: support us, or it will be us that'll blacken the skies around Love Field, causing all these alleged horrors on families and "the children." What's left out, or what these people don't know, or what these people intentionally are not mentioning, are the following: Worried about noise? Then why conveniently leave out that it's American that's just added noisier airplanes into Love? Tumble to it: those MD-80s AA's now flying to STL and MCI tend to have a nastier noise footprint than Southwest's 737-700s. So, if you folks are sooooo indignant and objective about airplane racket, you may want to ask your financial supporter why they added noisier airplanes to Love. Afraid of skies being crowded with airplanes around Love if Wright's repealed? Then y'all may want to get informed that American is the only airline that has indicated that it would enter Love in a big way if Wright's repealed. Gee, the fact is that the noise, congestion, and family-threatening operations would be mostly those of your financial supporter. Objectivity has left the building. Did American Airlines and DFW truly want folks to stop and think? Or did they really just want them to stop? |
|
Stop and Think
Tune - 9 to 5 (Sung by Stop and Think.org)
Causin' more delay
Argue all the same points
Buyin' - time's our plan
Stop and Think (instrumental bridge)
Gettin' rid of Wright
Job's gone - now your
So just - Stop and Think
So Southwest |
