The FDA X files / Expedientes secretos X de la FDA

Data-Médicos
Dermagic/Express No. 5-(7) X file)
04 Junio 2.003 / 04Junio 2.003 / 03 Enero 2026 / 03 January 2026

EDITORIAL ESPAÑOL:
=================
Hace algún tiempo a través del DERMAGIC, denuncie algunas situaciones que me parecieron un poco extrañas tales como:

1.) La corrupción de los Laboratorios en la FDA para liberar sus medicinas al mercado..
2.) La aprobación de medicamentos después de pagos multimillonarios
3.) La eliminación de medicamentos después de grandes presiones de la Sociedad.
4.) La permanencia en el mercado de drogas aunque se ha probado que son dañinas para la salud.
5.) Manipular " propaganda "para que NO UTILICES algún medicamento,

El gran responsable: la FDA

Lea estos documentos y conocerá EL EXPEDIENTE SECRETO de LA FDA,,, CORRUPCIÓN ??? o interés COMERCIAL !!!

Saludos a todos

Dr. José Lapenta R

EDITORIAL ENGLISH:
================
Some time ago through the DERMAGIC, denounce some situations that me they seemed a little strange such as:

1.) The corruption of the Laboratories in the FDA to liberate their medicines to the market
2.) The approval of medications after multimillionaire payments
3.) The elimination of medications after big pressures of the Society.
4.) The permanency in the market of drugs although it has been proven that they are harmful for the health.
5.) Manipulate "propaganda" so that you DO NOT USE a medication.

The great one responsible: the FDA.

Read this documents and you will know THE SECRET FILE of THE FDA, CORRUPTION??? or COMMERCIAL interest!!!

Greetings to all

Dr. José Lapenta R

================================================================
DERMAGIC/EXPRESS 5-(7) X-File
================================================================
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS / BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES
================================================================
1.) FDA Attacks The Internet
FDA seeks to destroy Alternative Health Web Sites
2.) La FDA y el IVERMECTIN / The FDA and The IVERMECTIN
=========================================================
1.) FDA Attacks The Internet
FDA seeks to destroy Alternative Health Web Sites

Source: https://www.lef.org/

The FDA's history is one of incompetence, fraud, deceit and the continuous striving for more power. Over the past 25 years, the Food and Drug Administration has sought to gain authoritarian control that Congress never intended it to have. In every attempt to seize this kind of power, the FDA has been beaten back by a swell of public protest.

The FDA has just launched a disinformation campaign to deceive Congress into believing that the agency needs to "protect" the public from health information on the Internet. The FDA is seeking ten million tax dollars a year to attack alternative health and pharmacy web sites. If the FDA convinces Congress to give it the power and money to do this, American consumers will be denied access to innovative therapies, and will be forced to pay a good deal more for the nutrient and drug therapies the FDA allows them to buy over the Internet.

One of the FDA's proposals is to be able to fine Internet pharmacies $500,000 every time they dispense a drug without a prescription authorized by the agency. With this kind of excessive fining power, the FDA will be able to bankrupt any online pharmacy it targets. To make it easy for them to shut down large numbers of web sites, the FDA wants the power to issue subpoenas without first obtaining a court order, a totalitarian tactic the American public revolted against when the agency proposed it in 1990. Finally, the FDA says it wants to set up "a rapid response team" to identify, investigate, and prosecute web sites. In other words, the FDA is seeking to establish an army of cyberspace storm-troopers to enable it to shut down large numbers of web sites quickly.

The alleged purpose of these new powers is to "target and punish those who engage in illegal drug sales over the Internet." This may sound reasonable to the average person, but as members of The Life Extension Foundation well know, the FDA's history is one of ineptitude and corruption that has caused millions of Americans to suffer and die needlessly. In 1994, the FDA Museum was established to document FDA malfeasance, and show that the agency hasn't the scientific legitimacy to be allowed to police the healthcare of the American people.

A flagrant example of FDA deception can be found in their current attempt to control the Internet. The FDA has identified one person who died after obtaining Viagra from a Web pharmacy without a prescription. The FDA is using this one death as an example of why the FDA needs to impose dictatorial power over all health Web sites. One problem with this position is that, as of November 1998, at least 130 Americans died from taking Viagra legally prescribed by their doctors. (The total number of Viagra-related deaths for 1999 has not yet been calculated.) The FDA approved Viagra as being safe, even though many Americans have died when the drug has been legally prescribed. The FDA failed to detect this lethal side effect of Viagra, yet it is now seeking gestapo-like power to attack any Internet health company it wishes to, without due process. It's time for the public to speak up again to let Congress know that this kind of FDA tyranny will not be tolerated by tax payers.

Why Internet Regulation is Doomed to Fail

The powers the FDA is seeking are unconstitutional, and the agency has neither the competence nor the integrity to police the Internet, but even if it did, it would be impractical for the agency to do so. There are currently an estimated 8,000 health sites on the Internet. If Congress gives the FDA $10 million a year, the best the agency could do is shut down a couple of hundred sites a year. Within a few years, the FDA would create a litigation monster whose appetite would far exceed their $10 million annual budget. The FDA would be bogged down in a quagmire of judicial proceedings, while thousands of new health Web sites would be springing up that the agency would be at an utter loss to control. The end result of the FDA's war against the free flow of information on the Internet would be tens of millions of tax dollars wasted, with less so-called consumer "protection" than exists today.

The FDA Already Has The Legal Power It Needs

The charade the FDA is parading before Congress is that they need more money and stricter laws to regulate e-commerce. The facts are that the FDA already has the regulatory structure to "protect" the consumer on the Internet. Much of what the FDA wants is already covered by existing Federal and State law, but the agency is seeking to add another bureaucratic layer of law and money to suppress the dissemination of health information.

An Alternative Proposal

The FDA has its own Web site (https://www.fda.gov/) For a fraction of the cost of becoming the health police of the Internet police, the agency could post its own evaluation of alternative health Web sites that it thought were promoting fraudulent or dangerous products. Americans would then be free to make their own decisions about whether to believe what the FDA says about health web sites.

However, the FDA has no interest in trying to persuade Americans with evidence. It wants (and has always wanted) authoritarian powers and as much money as possible from Congress because it is a political organization rather than a scientific one. As a result, FDA suppression of information has been, historically, the leading cause of death in the United States, while adverse reactions to FDA approved drugs is currently the 4th-to-6th leading cause of death. Clearly, the FDA lacks the constitutional authority, the competence, the integrity or the scientific credibility to be given additional power and money to police the Internet.

A History of Victories Over the FDA

The Federal Courts, Congress and the public have dealt the FDA severe losses over the past 25 years.

The first citizens' victory occurred in the 1970's when the FDA tried to turn vitamin supplements into prescription drugs. An uproar from the public resulted in Congress unanimously rejecting FDA's brazen arguments that vitamins are so "dangerous" that they should only be prescribed by doctors. This blatant power grab came at a time when the vast majority of doctors had little or no knowledge of the health benefits of vitamins.

In 1990, the FDA tried to have a law passed that would have enabled the agency to make summary seizures of products from companies, and institute wire taps without a court warrant. The public again defended the Bill of Rights by inundating Congress with so much mail that the FDA's proposed law was abandoned.

In 1993, the FDA stated that it wanted to classify all amino acids and many minerals as prescription drugs. The public expressed such a high degree of outrage over the FDA's draconian proposition, that Congress passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (in 1994) that significantly limited the FDA's authority to regulate dietary supplements.

Since 1994, the FDA has circumvented the will of the people and Congress by seeking to censor what the public is allowed to hear about supplements and drugs. The FDA has been defeated repeatedly in the counts, and has been forced to retreat because of an onslaught of public opposition to all forms of censorship the agency has proposed.

Orwellian Computer Robots

A nightmare scenario sometimes portrayed in science fiction novels involves a totalitarian government using advanced computers to monitor the activities of citizens. In these novels, people who don't behave according to government standards are targeted for persecution or summary elimination.

The Orwellian prophesy is becoming reality as the FDA is proposing to spend a million dollars a year on artificial intelligence computer robots that would scan the Internet for phrases such as "prevents cancer" and "prescription drug" so the FDA could "swiftly gather the information needed to prosecute."

The new law the FDA is proposing would mandate that on-line pharmacies first receive FDA-approval to operate. Pharmacies are currently regulated by the States, but the FDA is seeking to impose a new Federal bureaucratic layer that will greatly increase the cost of purchasing products on the Internet.

The FDA needs to convince Congress that American citizens should be subjected to Orwellian investigative tactics and that tax payer dollars should be appropriated to pay for these Web robots to assist the FDA in detecting words it does not want Americans to read.

American citizens who cherish their Constitutional rights against undue government intrusion should contact their members of Congress and demand that the FDA not be given the money, nor the legal authority to control the Internet. This is more than just a health freedom issue. The FDA's Orwellian proposals are unprecedented and would create lead to a serious breakdown of our civil liberties if enacted into law.

Just Tell Congress To Say "No" to The FDA

The FDA is using the free-flowing popularity of the Internet in a ploy to deceive Congress into appropriating ten million tax dollars a year to fund an unconstitutional witch hunt against free speech. The new powers the FDA is seeking are blatantly un-American and resemble the kinds of police-state tactics employed by totalitarian regimes such as communist China.

The FDA's latest fabrication will fail if Americans tell their Congressional representatives to say NO to any new proposal or law that would give the FDA more power or money. Included in this message is a letter that can be sent to Congress. To obtain the name, e-mail address, voice phone number, and fax number of your member of Congress, check https://www.house.gov/ or phone the Congressional switchboard at 1-202-224-3121.

Note: the House Directory at https://www.house.gov/ was not working despite repeated attempts between 7:30 and 8:00 pm EST 1/5/00 but you can find both e-mail and mailing information for your Representative by selecting "Member Offices."

We suggest that you also send a copy of this letter to:

The President
The White House
Washington, DC 20500
You can E-mail the President at this White House page:
www.whitehouse.gov/WH/Mail/html/Mail_President.html

You can access the Foundation's Website at https://www.lef.org/ to obtain additional

information about the FDA's track record of unlawfully suppressing life saving information.

We encourage Foundation members to defend the Constitution against the FDA's latest attempt to gain repressive power over the individual's right to choose. Please send the following letter (and/or your own letter) to your Congressional representative:

A Letter to Your Congressional Representative

==================================================================
La FDA Y el IVERMECTIN
==================================================================
03 Enero 2026

Cuando la recién PANDEMIA DEL Sars-Cov-2 o COVID19, varios médicos, e incluso algunos GOBIERNOS (Sudamérica) comenzaron a utilizar el IVERMECTIN para el tratamiento del virus, algunos con ÉXITO, otros sin ÉXITO. Estoy hablando del año 2021, cuándo la pandemia estaba en su mayor OLA.

Lo cierto del caso es que la FDA DIFUNDIÓ LA FOTO que ves abajo, diciendo que TU NO ERAS UN CABALLO, Y QUE NO DEBÍAS UTILIZAR IVRMECTIN, para el tratamiento del COVID 19, prácticamente que no era ÚTIL.

Una clara alusión a que DEBÍAS VACUNARTE contra el mismo. Tampoco esta droga que es un ANTIPARASITARIO fue aprobada como medicamento reutilizable como medicina alternativa por la FDA, para el SARS.

Hoy día se consigue en los Estados Unidos solo en TENNESSEE, un SOLO estado. Cuando es una medicina CLASE C, de pocos efectos secundarios y de venta LIBRE en todo el mundo. Lo mismo ocurrió con la CLOROQUINA e HIDROXICLOROQUINA, también medicamentos ANTIPARASITARIOS (Malaria).

Presiones recibió la FDA ??, en un futuro lo sabremos !!!.

Lo cierto es que hoy día 2026 LA FDA no aprueba su uso para el tratamiento del SARS. Pero muchos doctores A NIVEL MUNDIAL LO ESTÁN UTILIZANDO !!!

NOTA: MEDICAMENTO CLASE C: IVERMECTIN en el Embarazo: Significado:

1.- No existen estudios adecuados y bien controlados en mujeres embarazadas.

2- Estudios en animales han mostrado efectos adversos sobre el feto, como abortos y malformaciones, pero no se ha establecido claramente el riesgo en humanos.

3.- El uso durante el embarazo solo se justifica si el beneficio potencial supera el riesgo para el feto

REFERENCIAS

1.) Evaluación crítica de la terapia multimedicamentosa en el manejo ambulatorio de pacientes con COVID-19 e hipoxemia Parte I (Enlace aquí)
2,) Evaluación crítica de la terapia multimedicamentosa en el manejo ambulatorio de pacientes con COVID-19 e hipoxemia Parte II: Inferencia causal utilizando los criterios de Bradford Hill (Enlace aquí)

==================================================================
THE FDA and IVERMECTIN
==================================================================
03 January 2026

During the recent SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 pandemic, several doctors and even some governments (in South America) began using IVERMECTIN to treat the virus, some with success, others without. I'm talking about 2021, when the pandemic was at its peak.

The truth is that the FDA released the photo you see below, saying that you weren't a horse and that you shouldn't have used Ivermectin to treat COVID-19; it was practically useless.

A clear allusion to the fact that you should have been vaccinated against it. Nor was this drug, which is an antiparasitic, approved as a reusable alternative medicine by the FDA for SARS.

Today, it is only available in the United States in Tennessee, a SINGLE state. When it's a Class C, drug, with few side effects, and sold OVER THE COUNTER worldwide. The same thing happened with Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine, also antiparasitic drugs (malaria).

Was the FDA under pressure? We'll find out in the future! The truth is that as today 2026, the FDA has not approved its use for the treatment of SARS. But many doctors worldwide are using it!!

NOTE: CLASS C DRUG: IVERMECTIN in Pregnancy: Meaning:

1. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.

2. Animal studies have shown adverse effects on the fetus, such as miscarriage and birth defects, but the risk in humans has not been clearly established.

3. Use during pregnancy is only justified if the potential benefit outweighs the risk to the fetus.

REFERENCES

1.) Critical appraisal of multidrug therapy in the ambulatory management of patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemia Part I (link here)
2.) Critical appraisal of multidrug therapy in the ambulatory management of patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemia Part II: Causal inference using the Bradford Hill criteria. Part II (Link here)

==================================================================

==================================================================
DATA-MÉDICOS/DERMAGIC-EXPRESS No 5-(X-6) 04/04//2003-26 DR. JOSÉ LAPENTA
===================================================================

The FDA Secret X Secret X File !!!!

El Expediente Secreto X de la FDA !!!