|
Corrections to the IWPR's "Massacres Still Haunt Azerbaijan's Armenians" Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 01:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ HL LETTERS
(original article which has been already corrected appears in the end of the letter) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
Sir,
IWPR bulletin's are usually well-written, on the point and succinct. However, in the latest Issue 29 for April 28, 2000, the article "Massacres Still Haunt Azerbaijan's Armenians" makes and perpetuates several critical and gross mistakes. For example, in just one short (!) paragraph, we have three groundless and false claims:
1) From the article we learn that "hundreds of Armenians were massacred in Sumgait [in 1988]" This was never even claimed by Armenian propaganda at the height of the Armenia-Azerbaijan war! The official investigation proved a total of 32 people killed, from which 6 were Azerbaijani, and 26 Armenian. Reliable Armenian sources confirm these figures, such as a book published in Yerevan in September 1989. It was a transcript of the press-conference organized by the Armenian "Gushamatian" society and Armenian Union of Journalists on September 23rd in Yerevan. It is also important to note that the head of the Sumgait mob was...Armenian, Edik Grigoryan, who was identified by his Armenian victims, and sentenced to imprisonment. However, he has then been transferred to a prison somewhere in Russia, and all traces perished.
2) The author goes on to claim that "Two years later, [in 1990] 150 died when rampaging mobs took to the streets of Baku." Armenia's own sources estimate the toll at upper 60's -- where is more than twice higher 150 figure from?
3) "10,000 Armenians living in Azerbaijan." First of all, there are much more Armenians living in Azerbaijan. Last time one bothered to check, Karabakh region along with other currently occupied by Armenia districts of Azerbaijan are exactly that -- legally, historically and politically part of Azerbaijan. Throughout these regions, there are around 80,000 Armenians living, although lower and higher estimates exist as well.
However, even if we discount the occupied territories as yet another unintentional mistake of the author, I feel obliged to point out that the Armenian population in Baku and some other parts of northern Azerbaijan, ranges from 20,000 to 30,000. By the way, both figures are courtesy of the US Department of State, as well as many frequently quoted Western diplomats. So why did the the author choose to quote the lowest figure?
In addition, US Department of State, to its honor, year-after-year says the following: "[s]ome persons of mixed Armenian-Azerbaijani descent continue to occupy government positions." I should add that those positions involve high level posts, and even comprise opposition members.
Now, can same be said about the situation with Azerbaijanis in Armenia? After all, in late 1980's, there were more than 200,000 Azerbaijanis in Armenia. The answer is no, since not a single one remains. In fact, even all Muslim Kurds were expelled -- all 20,000 of whom came to Azerbaijan for refuge.
Yet, most importantly, did the author oblige to tell about the much higher number of casualties on the other side? The fact that first refugees were Azerbaijanis from Armenia? That the first two victims of the renewed violence were two Azerbaijani youths, 16 and 23 year-olds? What about terrible massacres at such Armenian towns as Gugark, Spitak, Stepanavan, Masis and others, where dozens of innocent Azerbaijani civilians were brutally murdered? I include below official data on the ethnic Azerbaijani civilian casualties of pogroms and massacres in Armenia:
2 people killed by doctors in hospital 3 people died because of no medical assistance given killed in the course of tortures 35 people died from heavy beating 41 person burned alive 11 people after torturing 2 people had their heads cut off killed and burned 4 people 1 persona hanged drowned 3 people 7 people run over by cars killed from gunshots 16 people frozen in mountains, while fleeing for safety, 49 people kidnapped and disappeared 8 people killed by electricity 1 person killed during traffic and other accidents 22 people 1 person suicide died from heart attack as a result of nervous breakdown 10 people, including one pregnant woman
Total killed 216 people, including 57 women, 5 babies and 18 children of different ages in this November 1988 terrorist action.
Finally, it the remaining parts of article regarding injustices with job, housing and military service, it should be emphasized that these are known to each and every Azerbaijani, regardless of nationality. These cases are too long to bring them up here, although it is very easy to prove.
Please, in future, be more careful when printing such overtly provocative and false reports. It would be even better if you print necessary corrections in your next issue.
With regards,
Adil Baguirov
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Massacres Still Haunt Azerbaijan's Armenians (corrected present version. Read online http://www.iwpr.net/index.pl5?archive/cau/cau_200004_29_01_eng.txt).
Just a decade after bloody pogroms in the streets of Baku, Armenians resident in Azerbaijan live in an atmosphere of fear and discrimination. By Alena Myasnikova in Baku Tamara B. lives with the enemy. An ethnic Armenian, she was born in Baku, married a Russian and has two adult children who both live in the Azerbaijani capital. In 1990, when armed gangs launched a pogrom against local Armenians, the family fled to Moscow. They returned six months later. Baku is the only home they know.
Although she is past retirement age, Tamara doesn't get a pension. She has never applied for one. "I don't want to make a fuss," she says. "If I go and apply for a pension they'll ask for my passport, which proves that I'm an Armenian. Who knows what problems that could mean for me and my family?"
Tamara's husband was a highly placed Communist Party official during the Soviet era and the family lives in a special apartment block built for the nomenclature. The neighbours know of her nationality but, says Tamara, "they have never behaved badly towards me or the children and we still live on good terms."
Like most of the estimated 30,000 Armenians living in Azerbaijan, Tamara keeps a low profile. Memories of the recent pogroms are still fresh: in 1988, 26 Armenians were massacred in Sumgait (previous edition claimed hundreds), on the Caspian Sea, during two days of bloodshed. Two years later, at least 15 (corrected from 150 in the previous edition) died when rampaging mobs took to the streets of Baku.
Recently, the Azerbaijani president, Heidar Aliev, personally guaranteed the safety of all Armenians living in the former Soviet republic. He pledged that any state bureaucrats caught discriminating on the basis of nationality would be severely punished.
But, with 98 per cent of their community consisting of women, most Armenians remain unconvinced. They reason that, if the government is unable to protect the rights of its own people, there can be little hope for representatives of ethnic minorities.
Discrimination is certainly widespread and often Armenians are forced to fight bitterly for their rights. One Armenian, Asya Khydyrova, recently won a court battle over her claims to a Baku apartment.
In 1992, Khydyrova, who was married to an Azerbaijani, took her three children to visit relatives in Kislovodsk. She returned a month later to discover that her husband had not only managed to process a divorce but had also removed her name and those of her children from the flat registration documents. To add insult to injury, he had moved his new fiance into the property.
Supported by the Helsinki Citizens' Assembly and the Human Rights Centre of Azerbaijan, Khydyrova took the case to court. She and her children were eventually awarded half of the living space, which they are now trying to exchange for alternative accommodation. This is a rare case of an Armenian national scoring a victory - be it a modest one - over the system.
Often, Armenians are forced to disguise their identities for fear of discrimination. Yana and Roman Arutyunova were orphaned in 1990. With nowhere else to go, they stayed in Baku where they were brought up by neighbours. Yana, then 17, refused to let her eight-year-old brother go to school because she was afraid he would be bullied.
This year, Roman was called up for military service and Yana paid $250 for a passport which gave him a Russian surname and Russian nationality. She was helped by an old friend of the family who had "good connections".
Yana explains, "Maybe the officers would have treated him normally, but I don't know how he would have got on with the other soldiers who belong to refugee families from the occupied territories."
Now Yana dreams of changing her own passport and getting a new surname and a new nationality. She says the situation is uncertain. "I'm afraid. There are a lot of people in Baku who know that my brother and I are Armenians, and they've helped us and still help us. But who knows what tomorrow will bring?"
Almost all Armenians in Azerbaijan live in the hope that the situation will change for the better. Their hopes have been further fuelled by recent peace talks between the presidents of the two warring countries.
Few, however, have the option of finding sanctuary in Armenia. There they are generally viewed with distrust and suspicion - in fact, one Azerbaijani journalist who recently visited Yerevan was astonished to hear the comment, "They [the Armenians in Azerbaijan] don't have the right to be called Armenians!"
But the number of Armenians prepared to fight for their rights as citizens of Azerbaijan is growing from year to year. To a large extent this has been made possible by the work carried out by non-governmental organisations which have called for people to stand up for their rights and join forces to fight discrimination.
Alena Myasnikova is a correspondent for Monitor Magazine in Baku.
p.s. the errors were explained as the mistakes of not author but that of editor. Copyright IWPR www.iwpr.net Referred from Habarlar-L
ARMENIAN PRESIDENT DISMISSES PREMIER, DEFENSE MINISTER... Robert Kocharian on 2 May signed decrees dismissing Prime Minister Aram Sargsian and Defense Minister Vagharshak Harutiunian and appointing Chief of Staff Mikael Harutiunian (no relation to Vagharshak) to replace the latter, Noyan Tapan reported. In a statement broadcast on Armenian Television, Kocharian said he was constrained to dismiss the premier in order to end a situation that threatens to "shatter the foundations of our statehood." Kocharian said that despite all his efforts, the president and government proved unable to work as a team serving the same goal. He said "political intrigues" between ministers "have become a way of life, while economic and other problems are snowballing to become a serious challenge to the country." He said a continuation of the status quo could lead to the collapse of the army. Kocharian pledged to cooperate with the parliament and begin consultations with deputies on a new government. Copyright RFE/RL
The Wall Street Journal Europe, 28 April 2000 Who's Poisoning Armenia's Body Politic? By Vladimir Socor Mr. Socor is a senior analyst of the Washington-based Jamestown Foundation.
Armenia's parliamentary majority, subservient to the military-backed government of Prime Minister Aram Sarkisian, moved this week to impeach President Robert Kocharian. The parliamentary move means that dominant elements in the government and their military allies are escalating the power struggle against an already embattled president. At stake in that rivalry is not only the political power in Armenia but also the country's external orientation. The presidential camp seeks to move from unilateral reliance on Russia to a more balanced course, one entailing improved relations with the West and accommodation with Armenia's pro-Western neighbors, Azerbaijan and Turkey, by laying historic conflicts to rest. Mr. Kocharian's opponents include those who would reverse these presidential initiatives on every front. The latest contest over power and policy in Yerevan is unfolding against a blood-stained backdrop. Armenia suffers from a chronic problem of internal terrorism, and has barely begun to face up to that problem. Political authority and legitimacy in the country virtually collapsed on Oct. 27, 1999 when gunmen burst into the hall of parliament and murdered Prime Minister Vazgen Sarkisian, parliament chairman Karen Demirchian and six other senior officials. Mr. Sarkisian was the country's undisputed civilian and military strongman; Mr. Demirchian, a veteran Armenian Communist leader, had ridden a wave of Soviet nostalgia to achieve unprecedented personal popularity in post-Soviet Armenia. With the death of Vazgen Sarkisian, the prime ministership passed to his younger brother, Aram. The leadership of Mr. Demirchian's party passed to his son. With that, Armenia became the first post-Soviet country to move toward hereditary succession of power -- a succession guaranteed in this instance by pro-Sarkisian and pro-Moscow army generals. Thus ruled by strongmen and clans, not laws, the impoverished country has become hostage to violence-prone groups acting within and on the fringes of the state apparatus. Sadly, the Oct. 27 parliament carnage was nothing new in Armenia. On the contrary, it capped a series of high-profile terrorist murders which have been linked to the shadow economy and/or political intrigues. Senior officials assassinated in the last few years include: the state security committee chief; the prosecutor general; the deputy defense minister; the deputy minister of internal affairs; the mayor of Yerevan; the director-general of railroads; and the president of the chamber of industry and trade -- to mention only the most notorious cases. Those and other murders and attempted murders have never been seriously investigated, let alone resolved. The perpetrating groups are enmeshed with the military, and security and law-enforcement apparatus and can influence the judiciary. Despite their rivalries, such groups share an overriding interest in not spilling the beans on each other and in perpetuating their turf- and spoils-sharing arrangements. Those arrangements can at times become unstable, as the periodic assassinations suggest. Yet on the whole the system has proven self-regulating, as its continuity seems to indicate. By contrast, the Oct. 27 bloodletting seems to have been the work of self-styled social rebels, using terror as a form of political action. Grabbing a parliamentary microphone, the assassins screamed out slogans about their "patriotic deed" and ultimate "sacrifice for the nation." Beyond that, their motives and their sponsors, if any, remain obscure. But the president's opponents in the government and military authorities in charge of the investigation are trying hard to implicate presidential aides in the crime and, through them, to implicate or at least blackmail Mr. Kocharian. This year the internecine bloodletting spread to Karabakh, the mainly Armenian-populated region that seceded from Azerbaijan several years ago in the hope of uniting with Armenia. On March 22, gunmen shot and wounded Arkady Gukasian, president of the unrecognized Karabakh republic. Authorities in Karabakh promptly detained the gunmen and the alleged masterminds -- an unprecedented display of effectiveness in investigating internal terrorism. Charged as organizers of the assault are the brothers Samvel and Karen Babaian, who were until recently the defense minister and the internal affairs minister, respectively, of Karabakh. No evidence against the Babaians has been produced; the only certain fact is that they are political and business rivals of Karabakh's present top leaders. In Yerevan, all political forces strongly condemned the Oct. 27 and March 22 assaults. But very few Armenian officials or politicians proved capable of pronouncing the uncomfortable truth. It was left to politician Paruir Hairikian, a veteran of the national-democratic movement in Soviet Armenia and of the Gulag, to note that "terrorism has become an integral part of our daily life." The practice of politically rationalized violence by a minority and its public mythologization stem from historic roots. A subculture of terrorism developed among Armenians in the Ottoman and the Russian empires during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when a tragic cycle of atrocity, counter-atrocity and constant "revenge" pitted Armenians against Turks. Armenian armed groups also turned on each other in their underground operations, then and later. They drew on several external models: that of the Balkan guerrilla, West European anarchism, Russian revolutionary terrorism, Middle Eastern skullduggery from Syria and Lebanon -- where the anti-Turkish, terrorist Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia (ASALA) was based during the 1970s and 1980s -- and ultimately the influence of the USSR's KGB, which used and spawned groups of that type. Many in Armenia and the diaspora have been shocked and aggrieved by the latest acts of internal terrorism. Yet, those acts germinated in an atmosphere that tends to condone terrorism -- as long as it targets the perceived enemies of the nation. Some nationalist circles are prone to defending and even drumming up public support for ASALA militants or for the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) through such devices as mass collection of signatures or demonstrations in downtown Yerevan. The Armenian leaders, political parties and opinion makers looked on passively at such public activities even in recent months. The legacy of the old terrorist subculture, lingering both within and outside the official establishment, poisons the body politic, ultimately victimizing all citizens in one way or another. Until Armenians emphatically cast that historic legacy aside, it will remain a major obstacle to the democratic and economic development of the modern Armenian state. Referred from Habarlar-L |
|
|
Foreign Ministry reports Baku. 28.04.2000. /AzadInform/. The Azeri Foreign minister Vilayet Guliyev sojourning in Washington with a business visit held a number of meetings at the US legislative and executive powers.
On April 27 V. Guliyev met at the US National Security Council with the deputy adviser of the US President on National Security Affairs J. Stainberg. The sides held exchange of opinion on Azeri-American relations current state as well as further coordination and outlook of the Azeri-American cooperation.
At the same day Foreign minister met at the US State Department with the Ambassador-Coordinator of the American aid to new independent states William Taylor. Issues on stimulation American side's efforts on assistance to Azerbaijan within frameworks of exclusions from the 907 section and introduction of new exceptions to or complete liquidation of unfaithful sanction were in the limelight.
On April 27 V. Guliyev met with the US representative in OSCE Minsk group Kerry Kavano. The two discussed Armenian-Azeri conflict's settlement run as well as restarting of negotiations within frameworks of the OSCE Minsk group.
The same day Foreign minister held a meeting with the US Defense minister Edward Warner. Situation in the region, regional security on the background of the situation on the Caucasus, Azerbaijan's duties in regard to regional and global security, realization of the US-Azeri treaty on non-proliferation of mass destruction weapon were the main topics of the meeting.
On April 27 the head of the Azeri External Relations Department V. Guliyev held a number of meetings with congressmen - chairman of the Senate Committee for Armed Forces serving, congressmen-republican from Virginia state John Warner, congressmen-republican from Kansas state Sam Brownbag and congressmen-republican from Nebraska Chak Hetset. The parties discussed Azerbaijan's development forwards democracy and market economy, security in the region, Caspian energy and silk route problem.
The Foreign minister V. Guliyev met also with the special representative of the UN Secretary General Francis Dank. Mr. F. Dank laid stress on necessity for additional research of situation by places for carrying on measures for elaboration on rendering humanitarian aid to Azerbaijan.
The same day V. Guliyev held a meeting at the National Democracy Institute of International Relations with attendance of numerous representatives of the US state department and Congress, diplomatic corps and mass media.
Azeri foreign minister: Russia stepping up efforts to resolve Karabakh conflict New York, 26th April: "Azerbaijan is against the proliferation of nuclear arms. This issue is fundamental for Azerbaijan as one of our neighbouring states is a nuclear power," Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Vilayat Guliyev, who is in New York at a UN conference to implement the Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Treaty, has told Turan news agency in an exclusive interview.
Vilayat Guliyev said that during a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov the sides discussed issues of bilateral relations, as well as the situation with the settlement of the [Nagornyy] Karabakh conflict.
"Azerbaijan wants Russia to clarify its position on the matter and to keep to it consistently," Guliyev said. He said that Russia intended to step up its activities in the settlement issue.
During the meeting Igor Ivanov told the Azerbaijani foreign minister that the Russian president planned to meet the presidents of the three South Caucasian countries during another summit of CIS heads of states in Moscow on 20th-21st June. The main question at the meeting will be conflicts in the Caucasus, including the Karabakh conflict, Ivanov said.
The Russian foreign minister also said that Moscow would like to organize a trilateral meeting between the presidents of Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia. "From the conversation with Igor Ivanov, it became clear that Russia intends to speed up its efforts in this direction," Guliyev said, adding that Russia supported the idea of joining a security pact in the Caucasus.
Guliyev said that the issue of the Caspian's legal status was also discussed in the meeting with Ivanov.
Igor Ivanov invited Vilayat Guliyev to pay an official visit to Russia on 10th-12th July this year.
Asked by Turan news agency whether it was possible to expect fair mediation from Russia, which is a military ally of Armenia, Vilayat Guliyev answered that this issue was indeed interesting and worrying Azerbaijan. "This issue has become even more topical against the background of growing military cooperation between Russia and Armenia. Such cooperation damages the fragile peace in the region and poses a danger. We have said repeatedly that if Russia wants to play the role of a fair judge in the settlement of the conflict, it should stop supporting one of the conflicting sides. Russia told us it was ready for cooperation with us. However, the fact that the Karabakh conflict is still unsettled speaks of a divergence between words and deeds," Vilayat Guliyev noted.
Asked about a meeting with Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan, Vilayat Guliyev stated that the meeting had not taken place yet. "We have met before. Due to the lack of new proposals and ideas in the basis of the meeting, it might have a purely protocol nature. For this reason, the issue of meeting Oskanyan has not been clarified yet," Guliyev said.
The issue of the Caspian's status was thrashed out in a meeting between Vilayat Guliyev and Iran's Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi. The sides also broached issues pertaining to [Azerbaijani] President Heydar Aliyev's forthcoming visit to Iran. As for meetings with representatives of the US government, the minister said that issues of settling the Karabakh conflict, bilateral relations, Section 907 [of the Freedom Support Act, banning US aid to the Azerbaijani government] and the construction of the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline would be considered in those meetings. Copyright 2000 BBC and Turan
Milli Mejlis's statement to be broad to world countries' and international organizations' notice Baku. 28.04.2000. /AzadInform/. Today the MM convoked the next sitting. Eldar Ibrahimov, chairman of the MM SC for Agrarian Policy Affairs acquainted deputies with the MM statement regard to "Parliamentary elections" in the self-proclaimed Upper Karabakh republic. The statement contains MM's protest against the forthcoming June "elections" to the "parliament" of so-called "Upper Karabakh republic" established on the Karabakh area of Azerbaijan. The statement says this is the next provocation violating basic civil rights of 50 thousand Azerbaijanians driven out from Karabakh and testifies about Armenia's separatists intention to put obstacles on the way of peace establishment in the region.
The statement will be broad to world countries' and international organizations' notice through the Foreign Affairs Ministry. [further budgetary and other issues-not included]
N. Mamedov: "R. Kocharyan's state doesn't let continue peace talks" Baku. 28.04.2000. /AzadInform/. Head of the President's Executive Office Foreign Contacts Department Novruz Mamedov explained delay in talks between the presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia for the peaceful resolution of the conflict with sociopolitical processes taking place in the aggressor-state. According to him, tension of the domestic sociopolitical situation after 27 October events in Armenia prevented from continuation of the meetings. N. Mamedov also stated "R. Kocharyan's state didn't let continue peace talks". Under such conditions, when tense relations exist between the Armenian parliament and president, responsibility for conduction of talks and their completion is very hard. He holds, there is a hope for proceeding peace talks between two presidents. As soon as stability is established in Armenia, talks will be continued. AzadInform #358(438) 28/04/2000
AZERI CITIZENS UNDER FOREIGN TV PROPAGANDA Easy and quality broadcasting Armenian and Iranian TV channels in the Azeri regions which abut on those occupied by Armenia is a long-existing problem. There are regions where the quality of broadcasting even the national television of Azerbaijan is poor. The local population which doesn?t have an opportunity to watch national channels is being in informational blockade. The informational gap is filled by Russia?s ORT and RTR TV channels, as well as Iranian and Armenian channels, which have a powerful lever of propaganda in their hands. All this results in an ordinary Azeri citizen?s being without the necessary information he/she needs. Nonetheless, the head of the Presidential Administration?s socio-political department Ali Hasanov said nothing was unusual and negative here. According to him, it means that Azerbaijan is an open state and all conditions have been set up for its citizens to obtain information of every kind. It?s very weird but only one Azeri TV channel is being broadcast in the regions of Azerbaijan which remain under Armenian occupation. One wouldn?t be wrong if said that Iranian an Armenian TV channels are doing the daily propaganda job supposed to be done by Azeri mass media organs, although Hasanov says the matter is quite of technical character and all necessary measures will be done as soon as possible to prevent the anti-state propaganda of foreign TV channels. The head of the Ministry of Communications? TV and radio production association Bakhish Bakhishov said that 50-60 per cent of Azerbaijan?s population are able to watch Armenian TV channels, especially after Armenians installed a powerful TV transmitter in occupied Shusha region. This could be prevented only by installing a more powerful equipment. Bakhishov said such an equipment cost approximately $150,000 and the association couldn?t afford it for now. As for Iranian TV channels, due to the failure to choose the right frequencies dating back to Soviet times, they have been broadcast in a number of regions of Azerbaijan since. At the same time, it?s possible to watch Azerbaijan?s state TV channels in the regions of Iran abutting on Azerbaijan. Asked if it was possible to watch Azeri TV channels on the territory of Armenia, Bakhishov answered positively. The Azeri side is trying to achieve it and already did through the assistance of TV transmitters installed in Fuzuli, Terter, Agdam and Gazakh regions. Meanwhile, a pretty part of the population of Azerbaijan is still watching Armenian TV channels. ANS News, April 30, 2000
Armenia Prepared to Host Russian Soldiers from Georgia YEREVAN, Apr 28, 2000 -- (Agence France Presse) Armenia is ready to host Russian troops due to leave the neighboring Caucasus republic of Georgia next summer, Yerevan military sources said Friday.
"Discussions for the dislocation of the 102nd division are under way," one source said.
Georgia, which has strained ties with Moscow and has expressed a desire to join NATO, has signed an agreement underwrite Russia's 102nd division, which comprises some 2,800 soldiers, would leave by July 1, 2001.
The question of the Russian relocation into Armenia, with which it still enjoys warm times, was discussed in Moscow on Thursday during a visit by Armenian Defense Minister Vagarshak Arutyunyan.
Copyright 2000 Agence France Presse
Armenpress: Aliyev Calls for Quick Solution of Karabakh Conflict ######################################################################### HL NOTE: Some or all of the following news articles ignore such basic facts that:
1) Karabakh region of Azerbaijan was, is, and will remain to be a legitimate and internationally recognized part of Azerbaijan;
2) Karabakh, and seven other regions are illegally occupied by armed forces of the Republic of Armenia, the aggressor;
3) Puppet and self-proclaimed (Nagorno) Karabakh Republic ("NKR") is an illegitimate and criminal entity, not recognized by any international organization or state;
4) As of 1992, Khankandi has been restored as an official historical name of the town, that was renamed to Stepanakert by J. Stalin in 1923 ######################################################################### YEREVAN (Armenpress)-"For securing establishment of peace in the South Caucasus it is necessary to put an end to the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict," Azerbaijani president Heydar Aliyev is quoted by Itar-Tass as saying during his meeting with a delegation of Germany's Bundestag.
In Aliyev's words, his country wants peace to be established between Armenia and Azerbaijan and all economic and trade relations be restored. "It is necessary for the entire Caucasus," said Aliyev, "which is one of the most important geo-political regions in the world."
Referring to his country's relations with its immediate neighbors, Aliyev mentioned friendly relations established with Georgia stressing that Azerbaijan had no problems with that country.
He also announced that Azerbaijan comes out for "sound and close relations with great northern neighbor Russia and southern neighbor Iran."
At the same time he reiterated his concerns over deployment of Russian military bases in Armenia. He said that he had recently informed Russia's Putin about his concerns in this regard.
Copyright 2000 Armenpress
Construction of Karabakh North-South Highway to Begin In May YEREVAN (Noyan Tapan)-The $3.5 million raised during last November's telethon is enough to launch the construction of two sections of the North-South highway in the Nagorno Karabakh Republic. Hayastan Fund Executive Director Vahan Ter-Ghevondian announced at a press conference on April 25 that a contract for the construction of the Ghashbulakh-Kichan and Karmir Shuka-Hadrut sections will be signed in late May with the building company that won the tender. The construction of all six sections of the highway requires a total of $25 million. The construction of the highway's bridges will be carried out by a separate company.
Noyan Tapan Armenian News, April 28, 2000
News referred from Habarlar-L |
|
|
RUSSIAN TROOPS TO RELOCATE FROM GEORGIA TO ARMENIA? ArmenianDefense Minister Vagharshak Harutiunian, who traveled to Moscow on 27 April with Prime Minister Sargsian, will discuss with his Russian counterpart, Igor Sergeev, the logistics of relocating to Armenia the Russian forces to be withdrawn from Russia's four military bases in Georgia, Caucasus Press reported on 27 April quoting an unnamed Russian Defense Ministry official. On 26 April, "Kommersant-Daily" published what it claims is the full text of a secret protocol signed after the Russian-Georgian talks in Moscow on 20-21 April at which agreement was reached on the Russian withdrawal from Georgia (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 25 April 2000). LF
IMPRISONED KARABAKH JOURNALIST RELEASED. Vahram Aghajanian, a journalist with the opposition newspaper "Tasnerord nahang," was released on 27 April and his sentence suspended for two years, RFE/RL's Stepanakert correspondent reported. Aghajanian was sentenced on 12 April to one year of jail on charges of slandering the prime minister of the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Anushavan Danielian, in an article he published last November (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 14 April 2000). LF
Copyright RFE/RL
A S S O C I A T I O N O F T U R K I S H J E W S I N I S R A E L A Civil-War Within WORLD WAR I, Not Genocide! As Israeli citizens of Turkish-Jewish origin we would like to express our outrage at the comments of the Minister of Education Mr. Yossi Sarid drawing a parallel between the so-called "Armenian Genocide" and the Jewish Holocaust.
The Ottoman Empire never exercised a policy of racial or religious persecution or extermination against any nation. The Armenian claims against Turkey relate to a period when the Armenians waged a war of independence against the Ottoman Empire during World War I when Russian army and Allied forces were also invading Anatolia. This war and related events of World War I that cannot be enumerated here, led to tragic deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians.
With this background of events, any person, Jew or non-Jew alike, who uses the term "Genocide" or Holocaust equating the German holocaust against Jews with death of civilians in a terrible war situation, is guilty of ignorance OR denial of the depth of atrocities committed by the Germans and their collaborators against the Jews. Moreover, such ignorance also does great injustice to the Turkish nation that did its best to save the Jewish minorities through 500 years.
In a period spanning 500 years, starting from the times of Inquisition in Spain, to the German holocaust in the modern age, The Turkish Nation saved hundreds of thousands of Jews from persecution and decimation in the hands of European nations.
The Turkish benevolence towards Jews was an official policy directed by the Ottoman Empire Sultan, but would not have possible without the general tolerance of the Turkish people towards minorities.
During World War II, several Turkish diplomatic officials worked to save thousands of Jews from the Holocaust. Among these Mr. Selahattin Ulkumen was awarded the Yad HaShem Prize for "Righteous Among the Nations" for his heroic efforts to save Jews of Rhodes while risking his own life.
The brief statements of background above are brought to illustrate that unlike some European Nations, the Turkish nation has not had a systematic policy of elimination against minorities under its rule.
In view of our stand expressed above, we call on the Minister of Education, Mr. Yossi Sarid, to retract his comments. We also call on Prime Minister Mr. Ehud Barak, to issue a clarification to the Turkish Government that the irresponsible comments of his minister do not represent the official policy of the Israeli Government.
We hope that the long historical strife that has caused immeasurable suffering to both Turkish and Armenians will be resolved by direct communication between the two sides. We should note that a sizable Armenian population lives in modern Turkey with full freedom.
At this opportunity we also call on the Ministry of Education to include a special section on the history of Jews in Ottoman Empire, in history textbooks used in Israeli schools. This is the minimum we owe to the Turkish nation without which many of the citizens of Israel would not have been here today.
Prof. Israel Hanukoglu,Member Mr. Moreno Margunato, Chairman, Association of Turkish Jews in Israel
Referred from Habarlar-L |
|