PHILOSOPHY
HIGHER LEVEL
PAPER 3
SPECIMEN PAPER
1 hour 30 minutes
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES
• Do not turn over
this examination paper until instructed to do so.
• Read the text and
answer the question.
In answering this
question, candidates are expected to:
• Develop a
philosophical response in an organized way
• Use clear, precise
and appropriate language
• Identify what doing
philosophy means in the text
• Take an independent
position about the nature of philosophical activity in relation to the
ideas developed in the text
• Draw upon, and show
a holistic appreciation of the skills, material and ideas developed
throughout the course
*********************************************************************
Unseen text – exploring philosophical activity
Read the text below then write a response to it
(of approximately 800 words). In your answer
include:
• A concise description of philosophical
activity as presented in the text
• An exploration of the pertinent issues
regarding philosophical activity raised in the text,
relating this to your experience of doing philosophy throughout the whole course
• Appropriate references to the text that
illustrate your understanding of philosophical
activity
• Your personal evaluation of the issues
regarding philosophical activity raised in the text
**************************************************************************************************************************************
Wonder is probably as
old as humanity; it is also the starting point of philosophy.
Karl Jaspers describes
those moments that so often give rise to philosophical reflection. He speaks of them as times of either joy or
despair that jar a person into a state of wonderment, where all former answers and beliefs are
called into question. We all have probably had such experiences. We are all
philosophers on at least some occasions.
Humans can certainly
function practically in an immediate ‘survival’ mode without wondering about the above matters. But a
lifetime of such shortsightedness may begin to
feel unfulfilling. Of course, one could
take a shortcut and bypass philosophical inquiry by embracing a pre-packaged ideology which
provides ready-made answers to our fundamental questions. The philosopher, however, strikes
out on his or her own, searching for wisdom in a reflective fashion. It is this that
we call the philosophical quest.
Here it might be
helpful to contrast the informal sense of ‘having’ a philosophy, or philosophising, where we scrutinize our experiences and beliefs in a search for
insight and
understanding. In the first sense, each of us
already has a philosophy; indeed, we are creating our philosophy of life – more or
less unconsciously – all the time. “Don’t trust
people,” “there is life after death”: such
viewpoints, held unreflectively, influence our daily lives and guide our decisions. In
contrast, when we engage directly in doing philosophy, it is a time to take inventory of our
preconceptions and challenge them. With this more formal sense of philosophizing comes an emphasis
on reason, analysis, and argumentation.
In fact, philosophy
could be understood as the discipline that criticizes received opinions, in all subjects, from daily life to
aesthetic and religious experience. In this sense we can say that philosophy is radical in the most
literal meaning of the word; for whereas practitioners of a religion or citizens of a state
may take for granted the validity of the assumptions of their belief systems, philosophers
question those assumptions. Philosophers go to the ‘roots’
of ideas by clarifying, questioning, and evaluating our most basic assumptions. Often this challenge
to accepted norms and ideas can lead to views that are at odds with one’s culture.
In this way,
philosophy never rests, never reaches the final answer; all past answers are subject to continuing scrutiny and revision
by those who come after. Philosophy is, in short, a radical critical inquiry into the
fundamental assumptions of any field of inquiry, including itself.
One doesn’t have to be
a professional ‘philosopher’ to philosophize; wherever assumptions are being questioned, and opinions are
challenged, philosophizing is going on. Anyone willing to observe the overlooked, to
reflect, to analyze, and to put forth an argument can be a philosopher. However, those who
make philosophical reflection a lifetime habit perhaps deserve the label ‘philosopher’ most. For,
with practice, comes skill. The more one philosophizes and studies the philosophies of the
past, the more likely one is to gain real philosophic insight.
[Source: The
Philosophical Quest: A Cross Cultural Reader Gail M. Presbey, Karsten J. Struhl, Richard E.
Olsen New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1995
pp. xv-xvi]
******************************************************************************************************************************
MARKSCHEME:
SPECIMEN PAPER – PHILOSOPHY (Higher Level – Paper 3)
Unseen
text – exploring philosophical activity
Read the
text below then write a response to it (of approximately 800 words). In your
answer include:
• A
concise description of philosophical activity as presented in the text
• An
exploration of the pertinent issues regarding philosophical activity raised in the text, relating this to your experience of
doing philosophy throughout the whole course
• Appropriate
references to the text that illustrate your understanding of philosophical
activity
• Your
personal evaluation of the issues regarding philosophical activity raised in the text
This
paper consists in a response to an unseen text. The purpose of the exercise is
to allow students to reflect upon the nature, function, methodology and meaning
of philosophical activity, relating this to the students’ experience of doing
philosophy throughout the whole course. Students may reflect this in very
different ways in their responses, giving examples which draw from their
experience of the course. The following points – referring to the text extract
– might be included in a response:
Key Points
• Wonder
and amazement as the starting points of philosophical activity
• Opportunities
that stimulate philosophical reflection
• The
human person as questioner
• Human
existence as questionable
• Accepting
pre-packaged ideologies versus developing a philosophical perspective
• Having
a philosophy versus doing philosophy
• Philosophising as an
activity critical of commonly received and accepted positions
• The
way philosophy involves a radical inquiry into the assumptions of all
disciplines, even its own
• The
inconclusive nature of philosophical activity
• Philosophical
inquiry approaches all fields of inquiry
Discussion
• Is
philosophical activity the domain of trained professionals?
• Is
it necessary to be trained for philosophical activity?
• What
can you learn by studying the philosophies of the past?
• Does
there exist one method of doing philosophy?
• How
do different cultures conceive of philosophical activity?
• Is
doing philosophy as commonplace as living life?
• Must
we approach all aspects of life in a philosophical manner? Is this possible? Is
this probable? Is this desirable?
• Does
questioning the grounds of all assumptions help you live a better life?
• What
is the difference between a casual, common-sense approach
to important aspects of human existence as opposed to a more philosophical
approach?
• Is
there a possibility of considering multi-cultural approaches to the activity of
philosophising?