Open Cloze
Gap-fill exercise
Fill in all the gaps, then press "Check" to check your answers.
The mystery of Aurora suspect's missing Facebook account
As details unfold
the life of James Eagan Holmes, the suspect
the Aurora, Colo., movie
shootings, many are puzzled by the 24-year-old's apparent lack
a digital footprint.
"I am not a 24-
-old gun-slinging killer from Aurora," James P. Holmes wrote
Facebook on Friday morning.
Holmes is a Denver man who shares first and
names with James Eagan Holmes, the suspect in the deadly shooting that took
at a midnight screening of the latest Batman movie
hours before.
As the investigation got
way in the shooting at the "The Dark Knight Rises" premiere, in which 70 members of the estimated 300-seat crowd
killed or injured, those looking for clues to make
of it all went online for a digital footprint of the suspect -- to no
.
It appears
the suspect Holmes is not on any social networks -- at least not
his legal name. Yet the picture of Holmes that has
painted is not much different than that
a typical, perhaps disenchanted, college student.
This is what we know
James Eagan Holmes: He graduated
a bachelor's degree in neuroscience from the University of California, Riverside, and was about to
out of graduate school at the University of Colorado, Denver. The reasons
Holmes would get dressed
all black, a ballistic helmet, and tactical gloves and walk
that AMC Theater early Friday morning and open
on innocent people remain a mystery.
If he was on Facebook, we might know what's been on his
, what he had for dinner, or how he
the Fourth of July, offering insight
his mental state ahead of the events, but Holmes is not found on that social network, or
Twitter. He doesn't have a Web site or a blog. Unconfirmed reports late Friday allege that he may have been on the
site AdultFriendFinder.com, not a forum most would choose to connect
friends, family, or the greater public.
The fact that Holmes is not
perplexed denizens of the Internet throughout the day, invoking some to message people
similar names, create fake Facebook profiles, and even write articles pondering
Holmes presented no presence online.
Mashable Editor
Chief Lance Ulanoff can't "get
what an online ghost Holmes appears to be." Slate staff writer Will Oremus posits that
Holmes really doesn't have a digital footprint, or his name is so common that search results have been buried
Friday's news.
"It's certainly unusual. Data suggests that 95 to 98 percent of people Holmes'
are on social media," Dr. Megan A. Moreno, of the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, told CBS News. As for that
5 percent to 2 percent, Moreno, who has
connection to the case, highlighted a link
extreme Internet use -- or lack of use -- and depression.
A study titled "A U-shaped association
intensity of Internet use and adolescent health," published by the journal Pediatrics, attempted to
a correlation between mental health and intensity of Internet use. The theory
that poor mental health may result in either heavy
of the Internet or little to none.
But the lack of a Facebook
doesn't necessarily mean the suspect was depressed. If he was pursuing a graduate
in neuroscience, he may have limited his presence on social networks
professional reasons. After
, even with privacy settings
place, your information is still online.
There is the possibility that Holmes either used a pseudonym
his online accounts or his accounts were put on
, making them unavailable during an
search. A former student colleague told The New York Times that the suspect spent
in the lab logged in
online role-playing games.
A truth is that with tragedies comes the human
to ask "why" -- even when grasping at
. The fact that James P. Holmes had to publicly announce on Facebook that he was not the shooting
, and that a screenshot of his status update was seen thousands of
, is telling of how many have tried to connect
information.
A day and a half since the shooting, the mystery of "James Holmes" continues. People are "so angry they can't get to that person," Moreno said. "They're trying to get
anything -- trying to vent."
Adapted from: CNET, July 21, 2012.
Check
Hint
OK