|
CATEGORY
|
Outstanding
|
Excellent
|
Satisfactory
|
Below Satisfactory
|
Type of Graph Chosen
|
Graph fits the data well and makes it easy
to interpret.
|
Graph is adequate and does not distort the
data, but interpretation of the data is somewhat difficult.
|
Graph distorts the data somewhat and
interpretation of the data is somewhat difficult.
|
Graph seriously distorts the data making
interpretation almost impossible.
|
Temperature Forecast
|
All forecasted values are reasonable and
appropriate. There are no factual errors.
|
Most forecasted values are reasonable and
appropriate, but there are three values that might be improper.
|
The forecasted values are generally
reasonable and appropriate, but five values are clearly flawed or
inaccurate.
|
Forecasted values are typically
unreasonable or inappropriate.
|
Causes and Effects
|
Students identify more than 4 reasonable,
insightful causes/effects.
|
Students identify at least 4 reasonable,
insightful causes/effects.
|
Students identify at least 3 reasonable,
insightful causes/effects.
|
Students identify fewer than 3 reasonable,
insightful cause/effects.
|
Solutions
|
Students identify more than 4 reasonable,
insightful possible solutions/strategies to minimize the influences.
|
Students identify at least 4 reasonable,
insightful possible solutions/strategies to minimize the influences.
|
Students identify at least 3 reasonable,
insightful possible solutions/strategies to minimize the influences.
|
Students identify fewer than 3 reasonable,
insightful possible solutions/strategies to minimize the influences.
|
News Article – Headlines &
Captions
|
Article has headline that capture the
reader's attention and accurately describe the content. Article has a
byline. All graphics have captions that adequately describe the people
and action in the graphic.
|
Article has headline that accurately
describe the content. Article has a byline. All graphics have captions.
|
Article has headline that accurately
describe the content. Article has a byline. Most graphics have
captions.
|
Article is missing bylines OR article does
not have adequate headline OR many graphics do not have captions.
|
News Article – Supporting Details
|
The details in the article are clear,
effective, and vivid 80-100% of the time.
|
The details in the article are clear and
pertinent 90-100% of the time.
|
The details in the article are clear and
pertinent 75-89% of the time.
|
The details in more than 25% of the
article are neither clear nor pertinent.
|
Laws
|
Students identify more than 4 reasonable,
insightful possible laws to minimize the influences.
|
Students identify at least 4 reasonable,
insightful possible laws to minimize the influences.
|
Students identify at least 3 reasonable,
insightful possible laws to minimize the influences.
|
Students identify fewer than 3 reasonable,
insightful possible laws to minimize the influences.
|
Copyright
|
Fair use guidelines are followed with
clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for all borrowed material.
No material is included from Web sites that state that permission is
required unless permission has been obtained.
|
Fair use guidelines are followed with
clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for almost all borrowed
material. No material is included from Web sites that state that
permission is required unless permission has been obtained.
|
Fair use guidelines are followed with
clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for most borrowed
material. No material is included from Web sites that state that
permission is required unless permission has been obtained.
|
Borrowed materials are not properly
documented OR material was borrowed without permission from a site that
requires permission
|
Originality
|
Presentation shows considerable
originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a
unique and interesting way.
|
Presentation shows some originality and
inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting
way.
|
Presentation shows an attempt at
originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards.
|
Presentation is a rehash of other people's
ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original
thought.
|
Text - Font Choice & Formatting
|
Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic)
have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
|
Font formats have been carefully planned
to enhance readability.
|
Font formating has been carefully planned
to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read.
|
Font formatting makes it very difficult to
read the material.
|
Content - Accuracy
|
All content throughout the presentation is
accurate. There are no factual errors.
|
Most of the content is accurate but there
is one piece of information that might be inaccurate.
|
The content is generally accurate, but one
piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate.
|
Content is typically confusing or contains
more than one factual error.
|
Spelling and Grammar
|
Presentation has no misspellings or
grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no
grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors
but no misspellings.
|
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical
and/or spelling errors.
|
Sequencing of Information
|
Information is organized in a clear,
logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might
be on the next card.
|
Most information is organized in a clear,
logical way. One card or item of information seems out of place.
|
Some information is logically sequenced.
An occasional card or item of information seems out of place.
|
There is no clear plan for the
organization of information.
|
Effectiveness
|
Project includes all material needed to
gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective
study guide.
|
Project includes most material needed to
gain a comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or
two key elements. It is an adequate study guide.
|
Project is missing more than two key
elements. It would make an incomplete study guide.
|
Project is lacking several key elements
and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide.
|
Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |