INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE (IGCC) TECHNOLOGY SCAN
Get Paid for shopping on Internet

TECHNOLOGY SCAN ON INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE (IGCC)

1.0 COAL GASIFICATION & IGCC

1.1 Coal Gasification

Coal gasification is a process that converts coal from a solid to a gaseous fuel through partial oxidation. Once the fuel is in the gaseous state, undesirable substances, such as sulfur compounds and coal ash, may be removed from the gas by established techniques. The net result is a clean, transportable gaseous energy source.

In contrast to combustion process which works with excess air, gasification process works on partial combustion of coal with the oxygen supply controlled (generally 20 to 70% of the amount of O2 theoretically required for complete combustion) such that both heat and a new gaseous fuel are produced as the coal is consumed.

C + 1/2 O2 gasificationà CO

C + H2O gasificationà CO + H2

1.2 IGCC (Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle)

The IGCC process is a two-stage combustion with cleanup between the stages. The first stage employs the gasifier where partial oxidation of the solid/liquid fuel occurs by limiting the oxidant supply. The second stage utilizes the gas turbine combustor to complete the combustion thus optimizing the gas turbine/combined cycle (GT/CC) technology with various gasification systems. The SynGas produced by the Gasifiers however, needs to be cleaned to remove the particulate, as well as wash away sulphur compounds and NOx compounds before it is used in the Gas Turbine. It is the Integration of the entire system components which is extremely important in an IGCC Plant.

Various sub-systems of an IGCC Plant thus are:

i) Gasification Plant

ii) Power Block

iii) Gas Clean-up System

2.0 Relative Merits of IGCC over Conventional PC Fired Technology

Recent advances in the Gas Turbine technologies have presented great potential towards much higher gas turbine efficiencies. Increasing the firing temperatures and utilizing materials that withstand higher temperatures can increase the efficiency of gas turbine. Continuous developments have been taking place in the newer materials of construction thus consequent higher gas turbine performance. At present the efficiency of gas turbines is in the range of 45-50% which is projected to go upto 60% with the development of H-technology by GE. The advances in gas turbines would improve the overall efficiency of IGCC plant.

EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS OF IGCC POWER PLANT EFFICIENCY

  • Lower Heat Rates & Increased Output

The heat rates of the plants based on IGCC technology are projected to be around 2100 kCal/kWh compared to the heat rates values of around 2500 kCal/kWh for the conventional PC fired plants.

  • Flexibility to accept a wide range of fuels

IGCC technology has been proven for a variety of fuels, particularly heavy oils, heavy oil residues, petcokes, and bituminous coals in different parts of the globe. In fact the same gasifiers can handle different types of fuels.

  • Environment Friendly Technology

IGCC is an environmentally benign technology. The emission levels in terms of NOx, SOx and particulate from an IGCC plant have been demonstrated to be much lower when compared to the emission levels from a conventional PC fired steam plant. In fact, no additional equipment is required to meet the environment standards.

3.0 Type of Gasifiers

The Coal Gasification requires the presence of an oxidant in the process. Air or Oxygen may be used as an oxidant and the gasifiers are accordingly known as either Air-Blown or Oxygen-Blown Gasifiers.

Typical operating characteristics of the gasifiers are as follows:

 

Moving Bed

Fluidised Bed

Entrained Bed

Exit Gas Temp. 0C

420 - 650

920 - 1050

1200

Coal Feed size

< 50 mm

< 6 mm

< 100 mesh

Ash Conditions

Dry / Slagging

Dry / Agglomerating

Slagging

4.0 Technology Suppliers:

Different technology suppliers worldwide have developed the gasifiers which are either air-blown or oxygen-blown and are either of the moving bed, entrained bed or fluidised bed. The choice of the type of the gasifier is purely a factor of the coal/fuel characteristics. Various technology suppliers for the gasification process are as below:

Technology Supplier

Coal Feed Type

Oxidant

Gasifier Type

Texaco, USA /

Water Slurry

O2

Entrained Flow

Shell, USA

N2 carrier/Dry

O2

Entrained Flow

KRW, USA

Dry

Air

Fluidised Bed

Lurgi, Germany

Dry

Air

Fluidised Bed

British Gas/ Lurgi

Dry

O2

Moving Bed

Prenflo, USA / Krupp Uhde , Germany; Deutsche-Babcock, Germany

Dry

O2

Entrained Flow

Destec Energy, USA

Water Slurry

O2

Entrained Flow

IGT U-Gas, USA / Carbona, Finland; IBIL, India

Dry

Air

Fluidised Bed

Rheinbraun HTW, Germany

RWE Energie, Germany

Dry

Air

Fluidised Bed

MHI, Japan / IGC, Japan

Dry

Air/O2

Entrained Flow

ABB-CE, USA

Dry

O2

Entrained Flow

VEW/Steinmuller, Germany

 

O2

Entrained Flow

Hitachi

Dry

O2

Entrained Flow

Noell/GSP

Dry

O2

Entrained Flow

Ahlstrom, Sweden

Dry

Air

Fluidised Bed

5.0 SynGas Characteristics

Composition of the syngas depends on the fuel as well as on the gasification process. The typical characteristics of the SynGas as generated from different fuels at some of the IGCC projects are presented below.

 

Project

 

PSI Wabash

Tampa Polk

El Dorado

Shell Pernis

Sierra Pacific

IBIL

Schwarze Pumpe

Fuel

Coal

Coal

Pet Coke/

Waste Oil

Vacuum Residue

Coal

Lignite

*

H

24.8

27.0

35.4

34.4

14.5

12.7

61.9

CO

39.5

35.6

45.0

35.1

23.5

15.3

26.2

CH4

1.5

0.1

0.0

0.3

1.3

3.4

6.9

CO2

9.3

12.6

17.1

30.0

5.6

11.1

2.8

N2+Air

2.3

6.8

2.1

0.2

49.3

46.0

1.8

H2O

22.7

18.7

0.4

--

5.7

11.5

--

LHV, KJ/M3

8350

7960

9535

8235

5000

4530

12500

Tfuel, oC

300

371

121

98

538

549

38

Oxidant

O2

O2

O2

O2

Air

Air

O2

* Lignite/Oil Slurry with Waste Plastic & Waste Oil

6.0 Gas Clean-up System

The typical steps for Gas Clean-up System aim at particulate removal, sulfur removal and NOx removal. This is achieved as follows:

Hot Gas Clean-Up technology is currently under demonstration phase and various demonstrations have not been successful so far. Wet scrubbing technology, though with a lower efficiency, still remains the preferred option for gas clean-up systems in IGCC.

Technology Suppliers for Particulate Removal

S. No

Manufacturer

Gas Temp. (Max.)

Particle collection efficiency

Remarks

1.

Westinghouse Ceramic Candle Filter

10000C

99.99% for 0.1 mm size

Hanging Type Candles

2.

LLB Lurgi Lentjes Babcock Ceramic Candles Filter

10000C

99.99%

Supported both sides

3.

Pall Process Filtration Ceramic Candle Filter

10000C (max.)

99.99%

Supported both sides; Clay bonded silicon carbide filter

4.

Schumacher Ceramic Candle Filter

10000C

99.9%

Hanging type candles; Clay bonded silicon carbide filter

5.

Mott Metal Candle Filter

9500C

99.99%

Hanging type candles; Sintered Hastelloy

6.2 Sulfur Removal

Sulfur from the hot fuel gas is captured by reducing it to H2S, COS, CS2 etc. The current sulfur removal systems employ zinc based regenerative sorbents (zinc ferrite, zinc titanate etc.) Such zinc based sorbents have been demonstrated at temperatures upto 650 0C.

Sulfur is also removed by addition of limestone in the gasifier. This is commonly adopted in air-blown fluidised bed gasifiers.

In fact, in the case of Air Blown Gasifiers, sulfur is captured in the gasifier bed itself (above 90%) because of addition of limestone. The sulfur captured in the bed is removed with ash.

7.0 Power Block

The Power Block in the IGCC Plant is essentially a Gas Turbine Unit that operates on SynGas. This Gas Turbine Unit is basically the same as used for Natural Gas with certain modifications. The areas that are modified and also which need to be critically evaluated for use with SynGas are:

The gas turbine combined cycle technology has been proven for use with natural gas as well as with syngas.

8.0 Status of IGCC Technology

The technology level for each individual system component of IGCC i.e. gasification block, gas clean-up system and power block have already been established and proven in practice at commercial level. Integrating these individual technologies for the electricity generation is the concept of IGCC. To demonstrate IGCC technology at the commercial level, a number of projects have been in demonstration/operation stage. The fact that the IGCC technology has reached maturity stage, can be seen from the following table which gives status of various IGCC projects.

Major (Coal based) IGCC Projects Worldwide -- under operation

Project

Capacity

Operation

Fuel

Remarks

Luenen, STEAG, Germany

170 MW

Operated 1972-77

Oil

First Commercial Scale Gasifier (5 Lurgi dry ash gasifiers, Siemens KWU combined cycle)

Coolwater Plant, Barstow,California, USA

125 MW

Operated 1984-88

Coal

Texaco Gasifier (1000TPD)

Plaquemine Plant, Louisiana,USA

160 MW

In operation since April,1987

Coal

Dow (Destec)Gasifier(2200TPD)

Demkolec Buggenum Plant, Netherlands

253 MW

Started operation in 1993, commercial w.e.f. 1.1.98

Coal

Shell Gasifier � Initial problems encountered in Gas Clean-up System. Now operating with good availability.

PSI Energy, Wabash River Plant, USA

262 MW

Commissioned November,1995

Coal

Destec Gasifier, Repowering plant

Tampa Electric Polk Power Plant, USA

260 MW

Commissioned Sep. 1996

Coal

Texaco Gasifier

Sierra Pacific Pinon Pine Plant, USA

100 MW

Commissioned 1998

Coal

KRW Gasifier

ELCOGAS, Puertollano, Spain

335 MW

Prenflow, Krupp Uhde

Coal

Prenflo gasifier

commissioned in 1998

Schwarze Pumpe, Germany

40 MW

Noell KRC (7 fixed bed gasifiers)

Coal/ Wastes

commissioned on syngas September,1996 Power/methanol

Major (Refinery Residue based) IGCC Projects World-wide --- Under Operation

Project

Capacity

Gasifier

Fuel

Status

Texaco El Dorado, USA

40 MW + Steam

Texaco

Waste/ Pet Coke

Commissioned September, 1996

ILVA, Taronto, Italy

500 MW

--------

mill recovery gases

Commissioned January,1997

Shell PER+, Pernis, Netherlands (IGCC retrofit)

127 MW

Shell SGHP process

Heavy residues

Commissioned on NG in June,1997 & on syngas at November,1997

ISAB, Sicily, Italy

520 MW

Texaco

Asphalt

Commd. late 1999 (2 Siemens V94.2)

Sarlux, Sardinia, Italy

551 MW

Texaco

Refinery Residue

Commd. Early 2000 (3 GE MS9001E GTs)

API-Energia, Falconara, Italy

280 MW

Texaco

Refinery Residue

2000 (ABB GT13E2 GT)

Star, Delaware, USA Saudi Aramco-Texaco JV

240 MW

Texaco

Pet Coke

Commd. August 2000 , Cogen (120MWe + steam), Repowering, 2 X GE 6FA GTs

Status of IGCC Projects World-wide --- Under Construction

Project

Capacity

Gasifier

Fuel

Commissioning

KoBra, Kraftwerk Goldenberg, Hurth, Germany

312 MW

HTW/ Rheinbraun AG

Coal

2001

AGIP Petroli, Italy

250 MW

 

Refinery residue

2002 Power/Steam/H2

Fife Energy, Scotland

109 MW

British Gas/Lurgi

Wastes/pet coke/ coal

2001 Global Energy, $117m

EXXON, Baytown, USA

40 MW

Texaco

Pet Coke

1999 Power/ H2/ CO

General Seikyu K.K., Kawasaki, Japan

540 MW

Texaco

Heavy oil

2001

Vresova, Czech Republic

400 MW

HTW

Coal

---

IBIL,Gujarat, India

53 MW

Carbona/ Enviropower

Lignite

Environment approval pending

Gasification Technology Demonstration/Pilot Scale Plants

SCGP-1, Shell Oil Deer Park Complex, Texas, USA.

250 TPD demonstration unit

Operated between 1987-1991

Coal/lignite/pet coke

Shell Gasifier - 80% coal to clean gas efficiency, 99% sulfur removal achieved. Gas used for synthesis.

Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke, Berrenrath, Germany

720 TPD

 

Dry Lignite

HTW Gasifier; gas used for methanol production

American Natural Gas Co. Beaulah, North Dakota, USA

1000 TPD

In operation since 1984

Lignite

14 Lurgi dry ash gasifiers of 1000 TPD each for syngas production

British Gas Lurgi Westfield, Scotland

600 TPD/ 30MWe

Commissioned in 1984

 

Demonstration unit; pressurised dry feed moving bed slagging BGL Gasifier

IGT U-Gas Shanghai, China

800 TPD (8 trains)

Commissioned in Dec,1994

Coal

1st IGT U-Gas commercial plant Industrial fuel gas

Krupp-Koppers Saarbrucken, Germany

48 TPD

 

Coal

 

IGT RENUGAS Maui, Hawaii, USA

 

Commissioned in October,1996

Bagasse

IGT Biomass gasification technology demonstration plant

Sydkraft, Varnamo, Sweden

6 MWe + 9MWth

in operation since June,1996

biofuel

Pilot Plant; Ahlstrom CFB Gasifier, Sydkraft & Foster Wheeler JV

From the above, it can be seen that IGCC technology has now reached commercialization stage in the USA & Europe with a number of plants already in demonstration/operation phase. It may be noted that a number of IGCC based plants have been set up in USA with financial participation of USDOE with the objective of promoting the Clean Fuel Technology as well as part funding of the high cost of such plants.

A Japanese R&D team at the Tokyo Institute of Technology has claimed to have developed a new hot air-blown gasification system suitable for all kinds of solid fuel ranging from coal to waste. A demonstration plant of 4tpd capacity using this technology is scheduled for completion by 2000. The process named MEET (Multi-stage Enthalpy Extraction Technology) system, using air at 1000 0C is being developed to suit Indian fuels.

9.0 Operational feedback

Typical problems that have been encountered in various projects relate to the following areas:

10.0 Investment Costs

The costs for the IGCC based plants as reported are noted to be somewhat variable, depending on economy of scale, local labor costs, and applicable engineering standards. Further, gasification costs usually are estimated in combination with the downstream processing equipment necessary for delivery of a syngas suitable for conversion to the designed end product. Accordingly, gasification investment costs are best addressed on a project specific basis. The typical project costs as reported for different demonstration/commercial projects are as below:

S.S.No

Project

Capacity

Fuel

Gasifier Type

Gasifier Supplier

CapitalCost $/kW

1.

Buggenum, Demkolec, Netherlands

253 MW

Coal

O2 blown

Shell

2400

2.

Polk, Tampa Electric, USA

260 MW

Coal

O2 blown

Texaco

2000

3.

Wabash, PSI Energy Inc. USA

262 MW

Coal

O2 blown

Destec/Dow

1600 *

 

Texaco El Dorado, USA

35 MW

Residue

O2 blown

Texaco

2150

4.

Pinon Pine, USA

100 MW

Coal

Air Blown

KRW

2320

5.

Puertollano, Spain

335 MW

Coal

O2 blown

Prenflo

2900

6.

API-Energie, Italy

280 MW

Residue

O2 blown

Texaco

2850

7.

SARAS - Sarlux, Italy

550 MW

Residue

O2 blown

Texaco

2100

8.

ISAB Energy, Italy

512 MW

Residue

O2 blown

Texaco

2400

Source: Data published in journals

(*) Wabash river is a repowering IGCC.

An IGCC plant operating on heavy oil is somewhat less complex than a coal-based IGCC and costs are marginally less. The following graph compares current investment costs of IGCC with other new technologies.

Comparison of IGCC investment costs with other new technologies

Source: World Bank Website, Data published in journals

Source:

  1. Technical papers of Gasification Technologies Conference 1998-2000. (http://www.gasification.org).
  2. Technical papers of Ist International Conference on Green Power - The need for the 21st century (12-14 Februray,1997 New Delhi)
  3. Technical papers of Indo European Seminar on Clean Coal Technologies (1997 New Delhi)
  4. Proceedings of the Seminar on Texaco Gasification For Refining in the 21st Century (New Delhi April,1998)
  5. Various international journals such as Power Engineering International, Power, Modern Power System, Gas Turbine World etc.

BACK TO MY HOME PAGE | IGCC | CFBC | PFBC | SOLAR THERMAL | WIND POWER | GEOTHERMAL | FUEL CELLS | COALBED METHANE

Get Paid for filling up surveys