=jplt21

The Sharon administration, insofar as it exists, has handled quite
badly the matter of the Palestinian insurrection's appeal for
protection to the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

I have yet to see, beside the usual claque, much serious
discussion of the ICJ decision in the Post.

Israel should have accepted the ICJ's jurisdiction in this matter,
if only because of the precedent at risk.  Surely a people under
military occuptrion has the right of appeal to the ICJ.  It will
not do to say that this is a bilateral matter to be negotiated
between Occupier and Occupied.  The point of a judical system is
to give a voice to the unempowered and disempowered.

The ICJ may be merely a politically biased pseudo-judiciary forum
(rather like the U.S. Supreme Court under a Republican-appointed
majority).  But if so, that needs to be addressed directly (and
redressed quickly).

I have not read even a summary the ICJ's rationale for its
decision.  If the rationale was merely that an occupying power has
no right to annex land nor impede the movement of persons in an
occupied area, this reasoning should be addressed.


=================================================================
(Sent JP 16 July; printed 18? July)

UNLESS OF COURSE WE COULD QUIETLY ANNEX IT

Israel should offer New Zeland the fullest possible apologies, if
only for the stupidity of some of its citizens.  There are few
enough truly neutral countries in the world, and very few with
unspoiled ecology; their integrity should be respected.

===============================================================
Sent JP 20? July
                                   
Would it help if we offered to host the Olympic handball
competition at the Seurity Wall?  

================================================================

I am prepared to relocate, given suitable alternative
accomodation.  What I have in a find is a few dozen acres on a
lake (I mean a real lake, with trees etc., not an anomaly on a
fault-line.)

Bertrand Russell once asked an attractive matron if she would
consider adultery for a million pounds.  She blushed, and
indicated acquiescence.  He then asked her if she would do it for
a ha'penny.   She replied indignantly, 'Sir, what do you think I
am.'  He responded, 'Madam, we have already established what you
are; we are merely dickering over the price.'
              
I realize that Moshav Mevo Modi'in is not presently included in
Sharon's unilateral (or rather, personal) disengagement plan, but
the principle has been set, and one must think ahead.

It's a long backstroke to Cyprus, but Sharon at least does not
lack for bouyancy.

================================================================
                                   
SAVE IT FOR THE COMIC BOOKS
   
The Minister of Security says that `They' may zap Fatso, or crash
a Boeing into the Golden Dome.  In Israel as the USA, our fearless
leaders, having usurped power, are quick to find plots from which
to defend us.

================================================================