Nationalize the Air line Industry by Joe Flexer The labour movement and the NDP should stop relying on airline barons or potential barons to solve the crisis in the Canada's airline industry. The labour movement should unite with the NDP and compel the government to nationalize both Air Canada and Canadian Airlines and create a single publicly owned integrated airline under democratic management. This is the only structure which would provide the Canadian economy and the people of Canada with their air transport needs at the lowest price consistent with quality service while at the same time defending the interests of the many thousands of organized airline workers. In place of the market solution to the airline crisis the workers movement must fight for a socialist solution. The Crisis of the Airline Industry The crisis of the airline industry in Canada is not new. It began with the deregulation of the airline industry in 1987 and the privatization of Air Canadian 1988. To that point Air Canada had been a well running and profitable publicly owned corporation. It was privatized by the Mulrooney government in keeping with neo liberal doctrine that decreed the privatization of all government enterprise that produced a profit. This amounted to private appropriation of public assets. Sort of legalized theft on a grand scale. This publicly owned airline had shown a profit twenty one years out of the twenty eight years before privatization. The seven years of accumulated losses amounted to $150 million which, considering the scope of the enterprise and the difficulty of developing from the ground up air transportation in a huge and sparsely populated country like Canada was a paltry sum. In the nine years since there have been a number of junctures where crisis measures were required to respond to financial chaos in the industry. Except for the 1994 AMR bailout and 1988 debt write off at the point of privatization the bulk of the infusions of capital needed to prevent collapse have been at the expense of wage and benefit concessions wrung from airline workers under the threat of massive job losses. In recompense for subsidizing these two corporations with reduced wages and benefits the airline workers are now faced with a new and possibly terminal crisis of at least one of their major employers while the other is driving to yet further degrade their conditions of work. In financial terms to December 31, 1998 the two major airlines Air Canada and Canadian have amassed an accumulated debt of $3.9 billion. Today for all practical purposes Canadian Airlines is bankrupt and unless some solution is found the airline will collapse and be grounded within a year at the most. Since deregulation and privatization neither Air Canada nor Canadian Airlines have yet to "break even". In recent years (mainly 1997) Air Canada has shown a profit but this still did not offset large losses earlier in the decade and is not by any measure an indication of good health. The bottom line is that the airline industry today is facing economic collapse, rising fares and declining quality of service and the fear of the loss of many thousands of relatively well paying jobs. Solutions must be found. Recognizing this the Liberal government has established the legal framework which allows the two major airlines to discuss possible solutions and has expressed its willingness to consider making legislative changes in order to facilitate this. How Did All This Happen. According to prevailing neo-liberal ideology the "free market" produces the best services and products possible at the lowest price possible. This view has little credibility in virtually all sectors of the economy but least of all in the Canadian airline sector. Since deregulation and privatization what the CAW in its brief to government called "A War With No Winners" broke out. This war between Air Canada and Canadian Airlines has left both been weakened by competition aimed at hurting each other. Both airlines match each other's posted fares, dollar for dollar. Both airlines match each other's departures, minute for minute. Both airlines fly half-empty planes to the same destinations, or must offer deep discounts to fill their excess seats. The result is that the whole industry has been weakened by years of wasteful duplication. Like a punch-drunk heavyweight boxer at the end of the 15th round, the supposed "winner" of this irrational battle Air Canada. is left staggering and financially wobbly while the loser Canadian is going down for the count. Market "Solutions" The result of this war forced the federal government to finally consider restructuring the industry. In doing this the government faces a number of constraints. First it cannot, under existing law sanction the creation of a private monopoly. Second for strategic reasons the government is committed to prevent foreign domination of this key industry. It must also continue to maintain the 10% equity limit for any one stockholder established at the time of privatization. Finally the government being bounded by neo-liberal doctrine must come up with a market solution that satisfies these restraints. To this point two major proposals for restructuring have emerged. The first was the bid by the Onex corporation led by the scavenger capitalist Jerry Schwartz. Their objective was to buy both Air Canada and Canadian on the cheap, downsize and merge the two airlines and end up with a largely foreign owned monopoly grip on the Canadian airline industry. This bid was ultimately declared illegal by the Quebec Superior court on the grounds that the Onex bid violated the federal law passed at the time of the privatization of Air Canada limiting equity ownership by any single person or company to no more that 10%. At the time of writing this option is dead. Today the front running option remaining is the Air Canada solution. This involves implementing the long standing offer by Air Canada to buy out Canadian and thereby achieve a monopoly grip on the Canadian airline industry. Air Canada has included in its proposal the creation of a "no frills" low cost airline out of Hamilton. Shorn of its ambiguities and evasions such as one airline operating as separate divisions the likely outcome will be a new Air Canada holding a private monopoly position in the Canadian air transport industry. This being the case the federal government will be constrained to find some formula to regulate the industry in order to prevent price gouging and the other abuses that flow from monopoly. Experience has shown that regulation won't stand up to the power of a merged national airline to manage the market at the expense of travelers and other users. The notion that monitoring by Transport Canada or some other government agency can contain fares of a merged airline doesn't take into account the ability of powerful players to manipulate regulations. The same holds true for proposals to have Transport Canada regulate the capacity of the two existing airlines as an alternative to a merger in order to eliminate excess capacity and duplications. Such a degree of regulation could only be made effective by burrowing deep into the operations of both company's operations and developing of information and imposing conditions accordingly. This is bound to be rejected since it will be described by the business press and parliament as bureaucratic and pigheaded interference in the private affairs of the companies. The Case For Public Ownership The experience of the privatization of the Canadian airline industry has shown clearly that an unregulated "free market" structure can only create crisis. The only real option short of opening the industry to unrestricted foreign ownership is the creation of one single Canadian owned air carrier. The reasons for this are varied but have to do with the huge geography of Canada combined with its sparse population. It was for this reason that the only way that a domestically controlled air transport industry was created in Canada through a crown corporation. This policy was successful but came to an end when the Mulroney government privatized the industry leading to the present crisis. It is possible therefore to make a business case for one single publicly owned Canadian airline. The fact that this solution has not been raised in the public domain attests to the total hegemony of neo-liberal dogma. The most important element in air transport is the passenger load factor - the use of capacity. A domestic monopoly, with control over all flights and equipment allows for optimum use of capacity, by matching capacity to demand. It also allows for the best distribution of flight times and the economies of scale of larger aircraft. This translates into the lowest possible fares and the most convenient service. Beyond this "business case" as socialists we put forward a number of considerations beyond ecnomic efficiency. When capitalists invest in an industry their goal is the maximization of profit. Where the demands of profitability contradict social considerations such as access to remote locations or the provision of adequate wages and working conditions for those working in the industry the demands of profit must prevail. Socially owned enterprise on the other hand can set as its goal the provision of the best service at the lowest cost possible. Such enterprise is not compelled to produce a profit but needs only to break even so as not to burden the public purse. It can also plan to make a profit but such profit reverts to the public treasury and can therefore serve social goals beyond its own narrow purview. Finally, socially owned enterprises can be democraticaly administered and thereby open the way to giving full scope to the skills and creativity of the thousands of working people who make the enterprise go. How To Get There In the prevailing ideological and political climate the nationalization of the air transport industry might seem as a radical and unrealizable goal. We reject this view. What is required is the political will to convince working people of the efficacy of this solution and to mobilize them in struggle for its achievement. The working people of Canada have created two institutions, the NDP and the labour movement that between them have in potential the power to bring this solution to fruition. The nationalization of the Canadian air transport industry is a political project. The NDP and the trade union leadership must develop a plan to raise the issue in the public domain and to mobilize the mass base of the union movement including of course the three major unions that organize airline workers. Until today the NDP has had little to say on the question of the restructuring of the industry. Their pronouncements have been limited to suggesting that the federal government buy a minority equity in the restructured air line industry. The trade unions are demanding re-regulation of a two air line industry. For the reasons we have outlined above this is not a realistic proposition. We want more than a seat at the table. What is required is reconsideration of these failing policies and the launching of a combined campaign of parliamentary and mass action to achieve this goal. Failing this we can be sure that the future holds a continuing crisis for the industry and the many thousands of workers employed in this industry. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The Socialism From Below listserve was created by the New Socialist Group to discuss and debate socialist activism, share news relating to revolutionary struggles around the world, assist in organizing projects of socialist renewal and on the ground activism. Views expressed on the SFB list do not necessarily represent the views of the New Socialist Group as an organization or those of its members. For more information on the New Socialist Group and its politics and its activities contact newsoc@web.net or visit www.web.net/~newsoc =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To join or leave the Socialism From Below list, send an email to sfb@tao.ca--