http://www.cuttingedge.org/articles/db033.htm
    Chisholm's friend, Alger Hiss, agreed. In 1948, the infamous Soviet spy published Chisholm's message on mental health in his socialist journal, International Conciliation. Hiss, then president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, added his own Preface which showed the involvement of the Rockefeller Foundation in the mental health movement.[5]

http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/pages/articles/cold_war_myth.html
    Department of Education suported by Bush is involved in implementing communist agenda: School to work agenda, Humanistic (atheistic) curriculum including evolution, internationalism, etc. No right/no wrong curriculum: Alger Hiss's good friend, Gen. Brock Chisholm, Canadian psychiatrist, called for getting rid of the conscience in speech he gave in 1945 to World Health Organization (UN). We see results of his recommendation carried out in no right/no wrong curriculum implemented from 1965 on in our schools: Columbine, etc., etc. . .

Comment : President Bush has been "dumbed down" himself, apparently, and he is not necessarily the one to blame. Still, he is responsible for what is going on under his nose. I'm uneasy.

    There should be nothing wrong with anything humanistic, or atheistic, so long as no dogmas of any sort are being imposed on anyone.

Apparently, the legitimate claims by many atheistic persons to the freedom of conscience have become amalgamated with the Bolshevik propaganda ever since the early 1900's.

The murderous 'materialist' (not necessarily synonymous with atheist) is, correctly , afraid of religion for the most part.

(That does not mean that some materialistic atheists would not lie with 'God' on their lips, the criminal type being the problem — and not the atheist who is for the most part ethical.)

"No right/no wrong" propositions, noticed in the early Bolshevik propaganda in the U.S.S.R., later notable with Brock Chisholm, in the case of tha latter seem to have been an entirely deliberate attempt at confounding the three-valued or the many-valued logics.

No absolute rightness, or absolute wrongness can be found anywhere in the world. That does not mean that there are no rights and no wrongs, of varying degrees of the 'rightness' and/or 'wrongness'. (Right or wrong ?)

There should be nothing fundamentally wrong with 'internationalism', if rightly apprehended, provided one observers the following, more or less roughly stated : the Bolshevik overall conspiracy was international in character. Part of the propaganda machine plots was to discredit the notion of 'internationalism' by advocating it in some disagreeable context. ("The lie is normal, the truth is abnormal", observed the American Ambassador in Moscow in the 1930's.)

I, for one, would contend the following : the international malady (Bolshevism and its offshoots such as 'national socialism') can be only handled by international efforts. Otherwise, you will only have the criminals moving their operations from one country to another.
WPT.

http://www.harvardsquarelibrary.org/unitarians/chisholm.html
    "In July of 1946, he became the Executive Secretary of the Interim Commission of the World Health Organization, based in Geneva, Switzerland. The WHO became permanent in April of 1948, with Chisholm at the helm. He was now in a position to redefine the world's definition of health. WHO stressed the idea that health has as much to do with mental wellness as with physical wellness. By extension, Chisholm maintained, the well-being of humanity depends on the emotional health of the world's collective population."

Comment Could anyone tell me any difference between 'humanity' and 'world's collective population' ?