Lecture notes for 3/8/99
Freedom of speech -Salem Witch Trials (local level) -Abolitionists were persecuted in the 18th and 19th centuries protesting against slavery and other issues (local level) -On the national level, the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 prohibited speech that was meant to discourage the sale of war bonds; speech that was anti-government; speech against the Constitution, the military forces, or the flag of the United States; and speech that urged the curtailment of war production. -Schank vs. United States (1919) and Abrams vs. United States (1919) -both Schank and Abrams were prosecuted for violating the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 -Gitlow vs. New York (1925) -In this case, the issue of clear and present danger was often brought up. -Clear and Present Danger Doctrine -Involves two elements: -Seriousness: does a speech create a threat to the state and/or government? -Immediacy: is the threat so imminent that harm will happen before the state and/or government gets to talk about it? Freedom of Expression -Expressed rights to speech, media, and assembly -Implied right -Symbolic speech: actions other than speech that constitute political expression -O'Ryan vs. United States (1969) -O'Ryan burns his draft card in protest to the Vietnam War and was prosecuted -symbolic speech not upheld but recognized in this case -Tinker vs. Des Moines I.S.D. -Tinker and several other students wore armbands in protest of the Vietnam War -Issue of case: does the freedom of speech include wearing an armband that displays hatred towards the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War? -Answer: yes -Symbolic speech recognized and upheld -Texas vs. Johnson (1989) and United Stated vs. Eichmann (1990) -individuals desecrated the United States flag -burning of the flag protected under freedom of speech, considered symbolic speech