The
Melting Pot
Secession. It's a
searing, tearing word. A ripping
of social fabric that proclaims
civic, cultural and political
failure. Separatism by another
name. And it's what our neighbors
in the Valley and Hollywood are
intent upon accomplishing come
the November election. How did it
come to this? The municipal
rending of the country's second
largest city didn't happen in a
vacuum. So who fell asleep at the
wheel?
The
obvious answer is city and county
officials. Their seemingly
myopic, parochial and territorial
management has antagonized entire
segments of the population,
further eroding public confidence
in the business of governance.
Politically, the last fifteen
years in L.A. have been
uninspired, short-sighted and
disconnected, with the
consequences now looming. Those
leaders certainly bear fault. But
the harder answer is really
something else, a quite different
repudiation as it turns out, and
tellingly, though inadvertently,
expressed by two letter writers
to the L.A. Times recently. In
admonishing anti-secessionists,
one Los Angeles resident writes,
"...By the way, has anybody
driven through West Hollywood
lately? Independence has never
looked better." The
implication, of course, is that
cityhood automatically brings
prosperity. But another asks,
"Do secessionists really
believe that, overnight, the
Valley will become like West
Hollywood?" This really gets
to the heart of the matter,
namely that a governing charter
doesn't make a city. People do.
West Hollywood is held up as an
example of civic success not
because of municipal
independence, but because of the
local populous. We on the
Westside enjoy relative cultural
homogeneity, bereft of the
competing group politics that
roil social issues throughout
much of the rest of the metro
area. Though this may evoke
images of class consciousness and
distinction, the result has been
safe and attractive
neighborhoods.. The Valley sees
this and attributes it to
cityhood, when in reality it's a
matter of citizenry. It's also a
matter of common sense.
Twenty-five years ago, California
embarked on a conscientious and
noble experiment in social
engineering. This was soon
followed by major changes in
immigration laws, subsequently
casting bias toward the
previously under-represented
Third World. The convergence of
these two events, in addition to
creating budget-busting unfunded
federal mandates for state and
local government, turned what had
begun with the best of intentions
into the modern-day equivalent of
the Tower of Babel. Idealism gave
way to identity politics.
Multiculturalism replaced a sense
of community and commonality.
Business saw opportunities to
profit by way of worker
exploitation, all the while
giving incentive to illegal
immigration. And the shrill
indignation of special interests
turned dialog into one-way
communiques. The center could not
hold, as Valley secession
demonstrates in stark relief.
Diversity for its own sake has
erected walls, not bridges, and
the pluralistic ideals of the
past have devolved into ethnic
chauvinism, as group rights
displaced individual rights.
These are not the tenets upon
which to build an equitable
society, and were certainly not
the intentions of the original
multi-culture advocates. At
least, I hope not. But L.A., once
the envy of the nation, now finds
itself not only seriously
polarized, but increasingly poor
as well. Whether the issue is
public education, health care or
cultural unity, things are a
mess, with the one common thread
being divisiveness. Can you blame
the Valley for wanting out? The
experiment hasn't worked.
Admirable as it was, social
engineering has failed to deliver
anything worth emulating by a
nation that looks to us for
social and political trends. The
message now being sent is,
"If you want your
metropolitan areas to balkanize,
then follow our lead."
These
are topics that are not
ordinarily debated in public,
deemed to inflammatory to discuss
openly. And for precisely that
unwillingness to address those
issues do we now confront the
break-up of Los Angeles. For so
long, the hot embers were swept
under the rug to avoid stepping
on them, and now the whole house
is on fire as a result. Somewhere
along the line, progressiveness
got highjacked by "group
think", as it became
necessary to accommodate cultural
sensitivity first. Where
political correctness was once
rightly employed as a means to an
end, it has now become the end in
itself. Race-based politics makes
a mockery of citywide consensus,
and ethnic loyalties trump all
others. This is a "melting
pot" alright. The pot is
melting!
Do
I think the Valley will transform
overnight should secession pass?
No. But having the ability to
establish local autonomy over
everything from public education
(eventually) to voting district
boundaries will at the very least
impart a sense of building
toward something better and more
productive. L.A.'s vision of the
future seems to entail nothing
more than self perpetuation and
the same conflicting recipe that
led to political and municipal
gridlock in the first place.
Maybe the Valley really does have
a better idea. In any event,
secession, it would seem, is the
only realistic option left, and
that's a seriously sad statement
of affairs.
|